Ladies and Gentlemen,
Why do I still prefer the old Space Transport System (STS) to a space shuttle kit? Because of its unmatched efficiency: it can transport 7 astronauts into orbit, in provides with a living room for them and beyond this it can also carry 20 tons of payload at the same time - "fascinating!" Never will come anything better than this...
I guess with the old STS you could even fly to the Moon and land on it... By "rocking motions" towards and from Earth it could gather as much speed as to reach the Moon and STS could carry 20 tons of landing unit in its cargo bay - wow!
Don't forget the Space Shuttle that fast, really don't...
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
Saturday, January 8, 2011
International Space Shuttle (ISS)
Ladies and Gentlemen,
O.k., NASA wants something simpler and more reliable, something cheaper and something more flexible than the Space Shuttle of the past 3 decades was... However I don't think that a telephone cell for 3 persons (I mean the Orion Space Capsule - an unworthy and ridiculous continution of the Apollo-era) matched the demands of the present times and the heritage of the old space shuttles: landing on any airport of the Earth as an aircraft, reusability and comfort...
That is why I suggest that NASA develops a smaller space shuttle together with other space agencies for 3 or 5 astronauts... Russia used to plan such a small space shuttle that could have been launched atop the successor of the Sojuz rockets... The European Space agency used to dream about such a small space shuttle, too that could have been launched atop the Ariane 5 rocket... And now NASA has got similar demands, too - why not work together and share costs and benefits?
Let's say NASA, ESA ans Rosscosmos would develop together an International Space Shuttle and these spacecraft could be launched by the own rockets of each space agency - or the best rocket could be chosen for all launches... Anyway I think that the space agencies of the world should work together on a small International Space Shuttle and share costs and benefits... As international and worldwide cooperation turned out to be intelligent, secure and profitable in the past decades...
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
O.k., NASA wants something simpler and more reliable, something cheaper and something more flexible than the Space Shuttle of the past 3 decades was... However I don't think that a telephone cell for 3 persons (I mean the Orion Space Capsule - an unworthy and ridiculous continution of the Apollo-era) matched the demands of the present times and the heritage of the old space shuttles: landing on any airport of the Earth as an aircraft, reusability and comfort...
That is why I suggest that NASA develops a smaller space shuttle together with other space agencies for 3 or 5 astronauts... Russia used to plan such a small space shuttle that could have been launched atop the successor of the Sojuz rockets... The European Space agency used to dream about such a small space shuttle, too that could have been launched atop the Ariane 5 rocket... And now NASA has got similar demands, too - why not work together and share costs and benefits?
Let's say NASA, ESA ans Rosscosmos would develop together an International Space Shuttle and these spacecraft could be launched by the own rockets of each space agency - or the best rocket could be chosen for all launches... Anyway I think that the space agencies of the world should work together on a small International Space Shuttle and share costs and benefits... As international and worldwide cooperation turned out to be intelligent, secure and profitable in the past decades...
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Dead Birds Falling From The Sky
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The all-new Mercedes-Benz CLS Shooting Break is being tested...
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
The all-new Mercedes-Benz CLS Shooting Break is being tested...
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
New Investment Product
Ladies and Gentlemen,
My friends and me have created a new investment product: oldtimer cars... Oldtimer cars are like noble metals: they are rare, not used everyday but they make our life more beautiful because of the nostalgic feelings they wake in us... So are paintings and other pieces of artwork as well - however oldtimer cars could last even longer just because of recycling: you keep the antique design and fill it with modern technique... One of my friends even said that oldtimer cars are immensely underestimated nowadays as they should be valued by their weight... For example: "I am rich! I have the spare wheel of a Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith!" So steel and aluminium could become real noble metals - in terms of an oldtimer car...
Visit: eBay.com
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
My friends and me have created a new investment product: oldtimer cars... Oldtimer cars are like noble metals: they are rare, not used everyday but they make our life more beautiful because of the nostalgic feelings they wake in us... So are paintings and other pieces of artwork as well - however oldtimer cars could last even longer just because of recycling: you keep the antique design and fill it with modern technique... One of my friends even said that oldtimer cars are immensely underestimated nowadays as they should be valued by their weight... For example: "I am rich! I have the spare wheel of a Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith!" So steel and aluminium could become real noble metals - in terms of an oldtimer car...
Visit: eBay.com
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Super First Class Vs. SkyLoft On A Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental
Ladies and Gentlemen
You could also place Super First Class cabins on a Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental (most likely on the upper deck) - but why when you could also have berths in the SkyLoft?
I think that the main feature of the Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental could be the SkyLoft that means the usage of the giant "crown space" above the main deck...
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
You could also place Super First Class cabins on a Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental (most likely on the upper deck) - but why when you could also have berths in the SkyLoft?
I think that the main feature of the Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental could be the SkyLoft that means the usage of the giant "crown space" above the main deck...
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
Correction
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The famous Waterfall Palace is only going to be built - on an Artificial Hill, here on Earth...
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
The famous Waterfall Palace is only going to be built - on an Artificial Hill, here on Earth...
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Waterfall Palace
Ladies and Gentlemen,
A sketch of the famous Waterfall Palace on the planet New Earth...
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
A sketch of the famous Waterfall Palace on the planet New Earth...
Best wishes, Joseph de la Mikula and Team
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



